Thursday, January 23, 2020

Rshgdshrgsh

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on rshgdshrgsh. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality rshgdshrgsh paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in rshgdshrgsh, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your rshgdshrgsh paper at affordable prices!


Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote a time of great change in America. In the mid-nineteenth century, Americans began to experience a shift in focus from the once stringent religious outlook to a more scientific view of the world and its natural wonders. Americans, however, did look at these new scientific discoveries with much hesitation, questioning their long-term effects on society as a whole. Hawthorne' s work, "The Birth Mark echoes these sentiments and combine natural faith with a confidence in science to make a very interesting tale. This tale and its morality convey a message to the reader that there is a price for tampering with the natural order of things. This story opens by explaining how educated and knowledgeable Aylmer is, and the narrator even suggests that he may have the power to alter nature. " We know not whether Aylmer possesses this degree of faith in man's ultimate control over nature (Birthmark, 16 )."As Aylmer tries to use science to alter nature, or in this case, the birthmark on his wife's cheek, his plan backfires and his wife dies. The death of Georgiana shows that knowledge is dangerous if used in the wrong way. The influence of the evolution of culture has caused men to educate themselves, and learn extensive amounts about science. However, some men like Aylmer take advantage of their intelligence and try to play the role of God. Aylmer allowed his mind to consume his heart, resulting in the senseless death of his beautiful wife. Culture teaches men that if they learn enough that they can manipulate nature; however, in the Birthmark, Hawthorne shows that intelligence still can't overcome nature and thus culture is self-destructive. The fact the whole story is about removing a physical flaw from Georgiana's face when she is already obviously beautiful demonstrates the degree to which Aylmer has allowed this pursuit of knowledge and culture to destroy his ability to perceive nature's beauty. In this text, Georgiana and her birthmark represent nature, and culture is represented by Aylmer. Culture has taught men to question the flaws of women that they once found intriguing, therefore Aylmer is challenging nature when he tries to remove it. Aylmer is so wrapped up in this culture that he treats Georgiana as property. Her opinion about the removal of the birthmark was of little concern to him. Therefore, culture asserts that it is not only a separate entity from nature but that it has superior qualities. Because of Aylmer's belief that culture is superior to nature, the Creator of nature and culture alike chose to punish him. The punishment was not in an effort to be vengeful, but to show him what should have been important to him was not the birthmark on Georgiana's face, but the beauty that she possessed both inside and out that made him desire to spend the rest of his days with her. "…he failed to look beyond the shadowy scope of Time, and living once and for all in Eternity, to find the perfect Future in the present (Birthmark, 17);" therefore, he was forced to spend eternity without the one that truly loved himunconditionally. WORKS CITED Michelson, Bruce. Norton Anthology of American Literature. The Birtmark, pp161-7. Word Count 54


fdgfdsgrsajhsrgfjsrjrwt ey hdfsh d


Please note that this sample paper on rshgdshrgsh is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on rshgdshrgsh, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on rshgdshrgsh will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Is Henry V an anti-war play

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Is Henry V an anti-war play. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Is Henry V an anti-war play paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Is Henry V an anti-war play, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Is Henry V an anti-war play paper at affordable prices!


Henry V


Is Henry V an anti-war play?


You could refer in your answer to the Olivier and Branagh films and the contexts in which they were produced, as well as the context of the play's original composition.


At the time when Shakespeare wrote Henry V Queen Elizabeth was the country's monarch and the nation had just witnessed England defeat the Spanish Armada and become the world's strongest naval power. Therefore the 16th Century and original perception of the play is that it's celebrating England's supremacy in battle and shows this again by the production of Henry V and England's victory over the much stronger French. It's unifying the country through war and celebrating the country's pride. Henry V was also related to Elizabeth, so it's not only a celebration to the country but also to the Queen and her deceased relative.


Throughout the play there is a strong sense of patriotism, not only from Henry V and the battle that lies ahead and the fight for the country but more importantly and significantly the patriotism of the troops and their love for him. Part of this can be accounted for the some of the troops relationship with the then Prince Hal in Shakespeare's Henry IV. This makes their battle more personalised, they're not just fighting for the King of England but for the King of England who used to have a drink with them in their local pub. This means that for the play Shakespeare shows a sense of admiration and awe that the troops have for Henry as he was once one of them, and now he's standing side by side with them ready to fight the battle.


‘The Kings a bawcock, and a heart of gold,


A lad of life, an imp of fame;


Of parents good, of fist most valiant.


I kiss his dirty shoe, and from heartstring


I love the lovely bully


(Pistol IV.1 lines 44-48)


There is then of course great patriotism from Henry and in particular in many of his long speeches which take up one third of all the written text. Shakespeare's aim was to glorify Henry as in the shows first production there was Queen Elizabeth in the audience. Again after the defeat of the Spanish Armada the nation would have been in a very patriotic mood and this is expressed in the text by Shakespeare. Henry's speeches are most significant for the fact of him being able to rally his troops ready for battle; they're very complex in their nature and use numerous animal metaphors and rhetorical questions to get his intensity and passion for war over to the audience. Quite importantly Henry identifies with his troops, showing he is a man and not just a king and this identification with the troops gives the play a huge feel of self belief and patriotism.


‘We few, we happy few, we band of brothers


For he today that sheds his blood with me


Shall be my brother'


(Henry IV. lines 60-6)


In this particular speech Henry uses ‘we' three times, each time with it meaning more and it shows the brotherhood of war, that they're in this together, will fight together and die together. Henry is glorified through his speeches in particular by Shakespeare. This show of glory shows how the audience can interpret the play as a pro-war production with the King of England fighting along side his people for the good of his people. Shakespeare also evokes a great sense of honour from Henry and this is particularly important with how Henry's made his claim to the French throne through the Salic law. His fight for this and the fact that he truly believes his claim is just, and is willing to sacrifice his life for the cause shows emphatically that from this view point the production must be seen as a pro-war one. References to God also appear quite often, this emphasises that the cause for war is just and by using the Lord's name its how Henry believes he's fighting alongside him.


‘Follow your spirit and upon this charge


Cry, ‘God for Harry, England, and Saint George!'


There is also the only instance in the play where Henry is alone, and this is his Soliloquy when Henry's at his lowest ebb. (IV. 1 lines 18-77.) His prayer to God I feel can be interoperated in two ways. He asks for his help because he needs it, the French are stronger than him and this can be seen as a pro-war or anti-war message. Pro-war as he's asking God for help on the battle field and his men isn't as strong as the French. Or anti-war as he needs the help of God which could show that war isn't justified and he maybe doubting his claim and is looking to God for answers and if he wins the battle that will be the answer that God was on his side, but what's the price he'll have to pay?


Henry V has been adapted to the big screen on two occasions with each of these being different from the other, respectively. There was the Lawrence Olivier version produced as anti-Nazi propaganda which its effect was said to be ‘Stiffened our sinews, summoned up our blood and gave us the determination to bash Hitler'. It was used to raise the moral of troops is the Second World War by showing the strength of the English when faced in battle. The second production was directed by Kenneth Branagh and this had an anti-war message to it. Still fresh in peoples minds were both the Vietnam and Falklands war and Branagh went about showing how horrific war can be. Olivier left out completely the traitor's scene with Cambridge, Scroop and Grey as this was a particular anti-war message of mistrust and treachery by those very close to the king. Branagh tackles the situation in a very emotional style, with tears in his eyes and a great deal of sadness of what his close friend Scroop had done to him.


‘What shall I say to thee, Lord Scroop, thou cruel,


Ingrateful savage, and inhuman creature?


Thou that dids bear the key of all my councels,


That knews't the very bottom of my soul'


(Henry V II. lines 4-7)


This was further more shown in the Warwick Arts Centre production in which the audience could really feel the pain Henry was suffering when he confronted Scroop and it really gave the sense of the bitter side of war and how one can be betrayed through the greed of wealth.


The play by Shakespeare also portrays the gruesome side of war and this can be seen distinctly as an anti-war message. Over time the original interpretation of the play may have changed due to world events and the 1st Century's point of view may be that of anti-war. The scene at the siege of Harfleur (III.) portrays a very anti-war message with the manner of Henry's speech. ‘If your pure maidens fall into the hand/ Of hot and forcing violation? And, ‘Your naked infants spitted upon pikes/ Whiles the mad mothers with their howls confused'. This shows the darker side of Henry and is at the other end of the spectrum compared to his morale boosting Band of Brothers speech. This part of the speech is left out in the Olivier version but shown to its full effect in Branagh's screen play. It's very much an anti-war message as it shows the gruesomeness of war and what it can do to the innocent peoples involved. What I feel is a strong anti-war message is when the battle's over and the death toll is read to Henry. Where there are ten thousand French dead yet only twenty-five English dead. But with the French soldiers it's the amount of nobles that have died, including people that have appeared in the play like the High Constable of France. This leaves a bitter taste as it shows the price of war with so many men of high quality lying slain in the field. But it could be interoperated as pro-war for the English as not as many have died and only a few nobles, nothing compared to the numbers of French.


Finally when the play comes to the end there is the Epilogue which was wrote in the form of a sonnet and tells of what happened after the victory at Agincourt, which has a strong anti-war message to it. Henry V dies and he leaves it to his son, Henry VI, who then lost France through bad management of his estate.


‘Whose state so many had a managing


That they lost France, and made his England bleed'


The Epilogue I feel has an anti-war message to it because it shows how everything was lost after the soldiers and Henry's brave battles. It was what Henry believed in and he eventually lost his life to it only for it to be lost within months of his death.


So is Henry V an anti-war play, originally when Shakespeare wrote it but over time this perception has changed with different interpretations and ways to view it with different contexts in mind.


Word count 150 with quotes.


Please note that this sample paper on Is Henry V an anti-war play is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Is Henry V an anti-war play, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Is Henry V an anti-war play will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Wednesday, January 22, 2020

Is Richard III a study of how to structure a play or is it a study of how to gain political power?

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Is Richard III a study of how to structure a play or is it a study of how to gain political power?. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Is Richard III a study of how to structure a play or is it a study of how to gain political power? paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Is Richard III a study of how to structure a play or is it a study of how to gain political power?, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Is Richard III a study of how to structure a play or is it a study of how to gain political power? paper at affordable prices!


Is Richard III a study of how to structure a play, or is it a study of how to gain political power?


For different minds, Richard III could be percieved as a fine example of both how to structure a play and how to gain political power. Critics would probably be more intersted in the construction of Richard III than a person seeing the play for the first time. In my opinion, the configuration of Richard III is of equal importance as the plot.


Shakespeare uses several succesful devices in structuring the play, that make the audience feel like insiders. Dramatic irony, for example, allows the audience to know something that the other characters dont, to be in on the plan. Another of these is parralel scenes, where the audience sees events that are happening simultaneously, but to different people. This creates dramatic tension int the play.


Another device is dramatic irony, especially when Richard relates his plots to the audience. When Richard says


Custom writing service can write essays on Is Richard III a study of how to structure a play or is it a study of how to gain political power?


Dive thoughts, down to my soul. He lets the audience know what he is thinking, but means to keep his thoughts hidden from the other characters. These aside speeches and soliloquys are particularly fascinating because they are the only parts of the play when we see Richards true nature. The fact that Richard has to be very cautious as to whom he discloses his real nature is very important. Even Buckingham does not know Richards mind throughout the play. Richard only shows his true character to those who he feels pose no threat, and those who do see it, are usually disposed of soon afterwards. However, it should be most detrimental to his reputation should someone of importance to his plots see his character for what it really is.


The play is structured around several important themes. These are Richards ambitions, -his aspiration to the crown, irony, -how he decieves everybody and yet no-one suspectshim, fate, -Justice being done to Richard, good triumphing over evil, and morals, -that teach the audience a lesson about good and evil.


At regular intervals, Richard discloses his intentions to the audience in soliloquys. In the first scene, Richard reveals his plots to drive a wedge between his brothers, King Edward and Clarence, to play them off one another, then to have Clarence imprisoned and quietly murdered. Plots


to set my brother Clarence and the King in deadly hate the one against the other, and if King Edward be as true and just as I am sublte, false and treacherous, this day should Clarence be closely mewed up, about a prophesy which sais that G of Edwards heirs the murderer shall be.


This exemplifies to the audience Richards mercenary and remorseless nature, his willingness to kill anyone who interferes with his political pursual, regardless of his relationship with them.


Irony plays an important role in the play in many ways. For instance, dramatic irony, when the audience know something the other characters dont. Also when Richard drops hints of his villainy and plots to unsuspecting characters and when other characters oblivious words or actions prophesise outcomes, for example in Act Scene , Stanley tells Hastings of a dream he has had of Richard revealing his true nature, and endangering Hastings. Hastings dismisses this entirely and mocks Stanley for believing in dreams. He reassures Stanley wrongly of Richards kind and virtous disposition. This ties in with another theme fate, as Elizabethans were particularly intersted in the idea of interpreting dreams and omens.


Margaret, Hastings and the Duchess of York all prophesise Richards nemesis


Margaret Sin, death and hell have set their marks upon him.


Hastings I prophesy the fearfulst time to thee.


Duchess Bloody thou art, and bloody will be thy end, Shame serves thy life and doth thy death attend.


Fate also is an important theme of the play. The Medieval idea of the Wheel of Fortune that supposedly controlled ones fate suggests that Richards luck rose and fell in large fluctuations. It appeared to climax when Richard became King, but fell sharply almost as soon after he was crowned. The audience of the day would have identified with this, as Elizabethans were very superstitious.


Richards plight is supposedly parallel with the ancient Greek dramas. For example, the Greek tragedy of Phaedra, a young man who had an affair with his Fathers lover, and paid with his life as a consequence.


Though in my opinion, the fundamental, most crucial theme of the play is morality. Elizabethan people either were, or liked to appear very pious and devout, so plays with ethics or a moral lesson appealed to them.


Although Richards behaviour is scandalously immoral, the outcome is favourable to the audience of the day, because Richard is punished and good triumphs over evil. Richard certainly does not soften as the play progresses. He is willing to kill anyone who steps in the way of his political aspirations, including his own brother. He is willing to force his niece into an incestuous marriage with him, so as to secure his political gains.


The play appears to be of two halves. The first half, Acts One, Two and Three are focused on Richards success. The second half, Acts Four and Five, are centred around Richards plight. Richard seems to lose his power in the second half of the play, the audience see his weakness when people start to lie to him.


Elizabeth appears to aggree to woo her daughter for him, but secretly plans to get her daughter quickly married to Richmond


Shall I go and win my daughter to thy will? and


I go, write to me very shortly, and you shall understand from me her mind.


Stanley also lies to Richard about his loyalty


Most mighty sovereign, you have no cause to hold my friendship doubtful, I never was, nor never will be false.


Whereas once, Richard was able to command the devotion of his courtiers, he now feels that he has to blackmail Stanley with his nephews life, in order to keep Stanley loyal to him.


Not only is Richards downfall historically correct, but Shakespeare has enforced this with reccurring themes of right and wrong in the play. This seems so because Shakespeare knows this is what the audience wants to happen. However, it is true to say that Richard III is a biased play because


Elizabeth I was of the opposing Lancastiran family and Shakespeare embellished the truth to please her by diminishing Richards character, qualities and appearance. Although it has never been proven to be true, it is thought that Richard murdered his nephews. This was another point on which we cannot be sure of its testemony. His deformity in the play, was also not true to life.


I also believe thatRichard III is a study of how to gain political power.


The play closely narrates Richards ambitions and success in acquiring and maintaining his power. Richard appears to have a deep inferiority complex throughout the play. I think that this unprovoked bitterness stems from his deformity. Richard feels that his disfigured looks leave him unsuccessful in sexual exploits. He therefore states that


Since I cannot prove a lover, to entertain these fair and well spoken days, I am determined to prove a villain and hate the idle pleasures of these days.


Richards psychological acrimony is supported in his hatred towards the Woodville family, as he has no motive to justify his resentment.


Richard loses what little moral sense he has due to his political ambitions and is completely remorseless, unimpressed and almost amused by the way people are manouvered and manipulated by him...


Relenting fool, shallow changing woman. Richard mutters to himself after he thinks that he has successfully persuaded Elizabeth to woe her daughter for him. Richard knows exactly how to behave honourably and virtuously when trying to win peoples good favour.


For instance, in Act Three, Richard has to impress the Mayor with his piety, ironically because he masks his corruption and evil with unnervingly convincing performances.


In fact, throughout the play, Richard appears amiable and charming on the surface, concealing his true nature; a ruthless and bitter disposition completely devoid of feeling, though he is able to affect sentiments of sanctity and compassion when fooling others, which is unusual in a villain.


Richard, despite his deformities, is a proud character. Because he cares for no-one, he fears no-one. His arrogance dismisses Richmond as a threat, therefore Richanrd is defeated when he underestimates Richmonds strength. Fundimentally, Richards pride condemns him.


Although Richard appears to be composed 100% villain, he has some attractive qualities which would appeal to the audience; his humour, charm, wit, intellect and dramatic skills are all highly admirable. In terms of politics, I think that Richard would make a successful, clever King. His major flaw is that he would need to control his conceit. If he could overcome that, I think he would be able to easily outwit enemies with tactical ruthless actions.


However, he would probably be harsh and obstinate with his subjects as he is not compassionate, though his eloquent performances would prove successful in debating, persuading and in situations where he is required to behave diplomatically.


Though the construction and characterization of Richard III are of equal importance, I believe that the sequence of events has more initial impact on the audience. It is Richards success and eventual downfall that is of dominant interest in the play, but Richards intricate character is something to analyse on reflection.


A contemporary audience would find the play harder to perceive due to circumstances, such as the difference between the authority the monarchy had in Richard IIIs day, than today. Also, certain topics, such as witchcraft, have been provenand dismissed as irrational superstition.


However, an audience today would probably have a much more light hearted approach to the play because society today is much less restrained, where dysfunctional families and personalities are discussed a lot more freely and psychological disorders are researched treated and accepted today.


Though the different audiences over the years have different reactions to the play, the most common attitude towards Richard has stayed the same. Most viewers think that Richards ruin was a punishment for his wrongdoings.


Please note that this sample paper on Is Richard III a study of how to structure a play or is it a study of how to gain political power? is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Is Richard III a study of how to structure a play or is it a study of how to gain political power?, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Is Richard III a study of how to structure a play or is it a study of how to gain political power? will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Monday, January 20, 2020

The Problem with Affirmative Action

If you order your cheap essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on The Problem with Affirmative Action. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality The Problem with Affirmative Action paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in The Problem with Affirmative Action, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your The Problem with Affirmative Action paper at affordable prices with cheap essay writing service! Affirmative action is a controversial subject. While some support the view by suggesting that it helps to level the playing field, the opposing view promotes that such programs are unfair. The point is that affirmative action is something that will not be settled just as the abortion dilemma will always have two sides. While the ideas behind affirmative action is perhaps ideal, it has dangerous implications that white males have experienced. Although affirmative action tries to level the playing field, it is not fair.


Affirmative action does not include the ever-changing face of the average American. No longer are people black or white. There is more and more intermarriage and in effect, offspring surface who cannot describe themselves as one race or another.


Also, most people go against the concept. Americans oppose racial preference in most every form, and have recommended this strongly in many opinion polls, some of these including a large number of African Americans. You would think that in a democracy, the popular vote would rule. This is also consistent with the utilitarian point of view. Central to Utilitarianism is the premise that it is ideal to achieve the greatest happiness for the greatest number (McLeish).


Another point is that affirmative action, while once important, is an obsolete concept. Things have changed. Affirmative action might have been necessary decades ago, but things are different now.


Cheap custom writing service can write essays on The Problem with Affirmative Action


Critics of affirmative action also claim that it results in reverse discrimination against white men who are passed over in favor black men who may not be as qualified. This is a common problem and perhaps the best case as to why affirmative action does lead to negative consequences. There have been numerous law suits filed in a variety of situations including the educational and business realms.


Although many minorities and women do support affirmative action strategies, a majority says its benefits are not worth the effects that go with it. This is a significant problem today. Many people look at minority doctors and lawyers and in the back of their minds wonder if they are really up to the job. The very bright minority member, who might have surpassed most others, is second guessed and therefore held back to an extent. An individual would be far better off with the governments mandates.


Finally, affirmative action programs create low self-esteem. The programs not only hurt the competitor who is not a minority member, but also those who are being helped. Affirmative Action is supported by individuals with good intentions, who realize that school systems around the nation are not equal. In order to help minorities who have come from poorer neighborhoods, programs to give them a push into college or a job are endorsed. While affirmative action is a good idea, the reality is that the programs do have more bad effects than positive features.


Please note that this sample paper on The Problem with Affirmative Action is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on The Problem with Affirmative Action, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom research papers on The Problem with Affirmative Action will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment from cheap essay writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Sunday, January 19, 2020

SCience fair-Which brand of paper towel works the best

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on SCience fair-Which brand of paper towel works the best. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality SCience fair-Which brand of paper towel works the best paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in SCience fair-Which brand of paper towel works the best, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your SCience fair-Which brand of paper towel works the best paper at affordable prices!


Which Paper Towel Works the Best?


By


TABLE OF CONTENTS


SECTION PAGE


Write my Essay on SCience fair-Which brand of paper towel works the best


I INTRODUCTION


II A. PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION 4


II B. MATERIALS 6


II C. METHOD 7


III A. OBSERVATIONS


III B. GRAPHS 1


IV RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS 15 V FUTURE PLANS 17


VI ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 17


VII BIBLIOGRAPHY 18


Which Brand of Paper Towel Works the Best?


I. INTRODUCTION


A. Description


I plan to test four different brands of paper towels to see which brand is the strongest and which brand absorbs liquid the best. The brands that I will use in my experiment are Amway, Bounty, Brawny, and Green Forest (a recycled paper towel.)


B. Why I chose this project


My parents bought a case of paper towels from some friends of theirs who are Amway distributors. My grandma kept complaining that those paper towels were very cheap and tore easily. My parents claim that all paper towels are about the same. I decided to see who was correct.


C. Hypothesis


I think that Brawny will outperform the other brands in both the strength and in the absorbency categories. I think this because it feels thicker than the others and they advertise that their "Thirsty O's" make them stronger and more absorbent.


II. METHODS AND MATERIALS


A. PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION


How Paper towels are made


The process of making paper towels is the same way that all paper is made. Wood and other plant materials are ground up until they have separated into microscopic plant fibers. These fibers can come from brand new trees, sawmill scraps left over when larger trees are made into lumber, or from recycled fiber. When making paper towels, they typically use chemically pulped softwood fibers or recycled fibers. After the fibers are ground up, they are bleached white. The fibers are then pressed into thin sheets and dried out. Paper products can be recycled about five to seven times. After that, the fiber becomes too weak to become effective. When making two-ply paper towels, each ply is made separately and then combined using a process called embossing. This makes indentations on surface of paper towels and enables it to pick up more water.


How Paper Towels absorb water


There are two reasons why paper towels absorb water. The first is capillary action. Paper towels are loosely woven and have many spaces between the fibers. These spaces act like a sponge and trap the water. Water tends to travel up narrow channels even against gravity.


The second reason is that paper is made of cellulose. Cellulose is hydrophilic. This means it has the ability to become hydrated and, in fact, is attracted to water. The cellulose molecules can form weak bonds with water.


Researching Brands


In researching this project I went on to the Internet and read the ads for different brands of paper towels. Based on the advertising, I saw that paper towels are used for two main purposes. One purpose is to clean mirrors, glass, and counter tops. When paper towels are used for cleaning, strength is very important so that they do not tear while they are being used. The other main purpose of paper towels is to clean up spills. When paper towels are used for this, their absorbency is very important. In reading the various claims of paper towel manufacturers, each brand claims to be stronger and more absorbent than the competition. Each has reasons while they are they are better. Some focus on their strength, and their quilting or special designs. Some brands also stress how attractive they look. Several brands also claim that they absorb more quickly then the other brands. When paper towels are mainly used to clean up a spill, it is important that the paper towel can absorb a lot of liquid quickly so that less damage is done. In that case, absorbency is more important than the strength. I decided that for my experiment, I would test both strength and absorbency.


B. MATERIALS


v Paper towels Amway, Bounty, Brawny, Green Forest


v Scissors


v Water


v Medicine dropper


v Rubber band


v Glass bowl


v Pencil


v Paper


v Four rolls of quarters


v Ruler


v Large basin of room temperature water


v Stopwatch


v Two chairs


v Clothespins


v String


C. METHOD


For both the absorbency testing and the strength testing, I filled a basin with water and let it sit overnight so that it would be room temperature. I did this so that all of the water I used in testing would be the same temperature in case it made a difference. I selected three sheets of paper towel from each roll. I spaced them out at least 10 sheets apart in case there was any difference in how they were manufactured. I then began to cut each individual paper towel exactly to 5 x 7.5 cm. I did this because this was the smallest size of the paper towel and I didn't want one paper towel to be smaller because this might affect the outcome.


For the absorbency testing, I placed a sheet of paper towel on the top of a glass bowel and secured it with a rubber band. This would keep it from moving. I then filled my dropper with the room temperature water that was inside of the large basin. I held the dropper about 5cm from the paper towel. Then I dropped a drop of water onto the paper towel every two seconds to make this accurate. My mom watched to see when the first drop would fall as I counted the number of drops it took to leak through the towel. I repeated this experiment times for each brand of paper towel making sure to be as consistent as possible. I recorded my result with a pencil and paper and then I took the average of each brand of paper towel to determine which paper towel was the most absorbent.


For the strength testing, I tied two pieces of string between two chairs. The chairs were 60cm apart from each other and the string was 0cm apart. Then I took a paper towel and wet it with exactly 15ml of room temperature water. I made sure that the water completely moistened the paper towel. I attached the corners of the paper towel to the string with four clothespins. I then put quarters one at a time onto the center of the dampened paper towel. I counted how many quarters it took to finally break through the paper towel. I repeated this three times and recorded my results as well as the average number of quarters that it took to break through.


III A. OBSERVATIONS


Absorbency Testing


Paper Towel Brand # of Drops When Water Leaked


Amway


Trial 1 7 drops


Trial drops


Trial 4 drops


Average 51 drops


Bounty


Trial 1 174 drops


Trial 18 drops


Trial 15 drops


Average 18 drops


Brawny


Trial 1 7 drops


Trial 78 drops


Trail 80 drops


Average 77 drops


Green Forest


Trial 1 14


Trial 14


Trial 17


Average 170 drops


Strength Testing


Paper Towel Brand # of Quarters When Torn


Amway


Trial 1 104


Trial 171


Trial 100


Average 15 quarters


Bounty


Trial 1 10


Trial


Trial 1


Average 15 quarters


Brawny


Trail 1 18


Trial 1


Trial 11


Average 178 quarters


Green Forest


Trial 1 6


Trial 78


Trial


Average 55 quarters


III. B. GRAPHS


IV. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS


Absorbency Testing


As far as absorbency, Bounty was the best paper towel. Out of three trials, it took an average of 18 drops of water before it finally leaked through. I was surprised to see that Green Forest came in second with an average of 170 drops. If a person is looking for a paper towel with good absorbency and also wants to protect the environment, then Green Forest is a good choice because it uses all recycled materials. I was surprised to see that Brawny came in third with an average of 77 drops. It is a lot less absorbent than Bounty or Green Forest. My grandma was right about Amway. It came in last with an average of 51 drops.


Strength Testing


Once again, Bounty came in first. It was the strongest paper towel as it took an average of 15 quarters to break through the paper. Brawny did much better in the strength testing. It took an average of 178 quarters before it broke through. However, Bounty is still quite a bit better. Amway was a lot weaker than the first two brands as it took an average of 15 quarters until breaking. The weakest paper towel was Green Forest. On average, it broke through after only 55 quarters. This is probably because it was recycled. When I was doing my research, it said that paper could be recycled five to seven times before it becomes too weak to be used again. If you plan on using a paper towel mainly for scrubbing and cleaning, then Green Forest is not a good choice.


In conclusion, my hypothesis was incorrect. Bounty was the best overall paper towel as it came in first in both tests. Even though Brawny advertises "thirsty O's", these were not very effective in absorbing water. This shows that you should not believe in everything that is advertised.


V. FUTURE PLANS


In the future, I would like to test other brands of paper towels to see how the measure up to my other observations. It might also be interesting to try different types of liquid to see if that makes a difference. I also might like to use colored water to see the absorption pattern.


VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY


BOOKS


Amato, Carol, et al. 50 Nifty Science Fair Projects Lowell House, February 1


Curtis, Neil and Greenland, Peter How Paper Is Made Lerner Publishing Group, March 1


Sweeney, Susan, L. Everything You Always wanted to Know About Recycling Vantage Press, March 1


INTENET ARTICLES


How are Paper towels made?


www.madsci.org/posts/archives/dec7/880151.Ot.r.html 1/11/00


How does paper towel absorb liquid?


www.madsci.org/posts/archives/may8/84878.Ot.r.html 1/4/00


Paper University- All about paper


www.tappi.org/paperu/all_about_paper/paperMade.htm /4/00


Please note that this sample paper on SCience fair-Which brand of paper towel works the best is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on SCience fair-Which brand of paper towel works the best, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on SCience fair-Which brand of paper towel works the best will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Thursday, January 16, 2020

Harm done to colonies due to imperialism

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on harm done to colonies due to imperialism. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality harm done to colonies due to imperialism paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in harm done to colonies due to imperialism, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your harm done to colonies due to imperialism paper at affordable prices with cheap essay writing service! Imperialism started in the latter part of the nineteenth century, which was triggered by the Industrial Revolution. Ever since the Industrial Revolution has started, competition among European countries has increased. In order to be the strongest among the rest of the countries, a nation had to be able to adapt to the new era and to be able to compete for survival, otherwise it was viewed as the weak and would eventually be defeated by the others. Mother countries such as Britain, France, and Germany began to develop new interests for the places which met their desires. Such desires included a dependable source for raw materials, and a large army to protect its possessions and the country itself. If all of these desires were met, higher standards of living could also be obtained, as well as prestige and the continuous prosperity of the mother country. Nations began to seek places which had a good geographical location and plenty of natural resources. Once they discovered these areas, they made them their colonies. By having colonies, a large army could be established to protect the mother country and its investments; raw materials could be transported from the colonies to the mother country and thus increased production. Imperialism benefited some aspects of the colonies, but was harmful in other aspects. Some colonies gained benefits such as better transportation as a result of new built roads and railways; better education for the people in the colony as schools were built; better shelters as new houses were built to replace mud huts (in the colonies in Africa in this case) (Mitchner & Tuffs. 17. P.17). However, not all the things that happened were beneficial. As a mother country came into power and took control of a colony, the colony could lose what she originally had, such as control over her own issues. After investigating the benefits gained and the harm done to the colonies, the evidence shows that the harm done due to imperialism outweighed the benefits. For example, as India became one of Britain's colonies, the lives of the Indians were in the hands of the British and they no longer had control over their own affairs (History of India, n.d.). Britain took advantages of India as much as possible and at all cost. People who lived in the colonies of Africa were forced to adapt to a new culture, thus losing their identity (History of Africa, n.d.). Therefore, imperialism was not beneficial to the colonies for the most part.


India was one of Britain's colonies. The main reason for having India as a colony was because it had the raw materials that Britain needed to help its industrial growth. The British law forced India to supply raw materials such as tea, indigo, coffee, and silk, they also forced India to change from growing wheat to growing cotton to help Britain's own economy (History of India, n.d.). As all the materials that Britain wanted were provided by India, profits were made mostly by the British and the Indian manufacturing was forced out of business. This shows the lack of consideration for the Indians on Britain's part. They did not care about the economy of India and they only cared about the economy of Britain. Everything that the British did was for the their own good and did not think of the consequences to their actions. Imperialism was not beneficial to the colonies when most of what they had to run the economy was taken away. It was bad enough that the British destroyed the local Indian businesses, but they also made the Indians pay taxes. Since the British had control over the Indian government, the people in India could not do anything to change their own taxation system. One third of India's annual revenue was spent in Britain for Britain's own benefit and the people in India had no choice but to stand aside and let it happen. As local businesses in India were out and the people in India were taxed at the same time, it was not surprising that food shortages started to occur in India, which caused the death of over 0 million Indians (History of India, n.d.). As a result of British imperialism, harmful things were done to the Indians. Not only did the British deprive the Indians from having control over their own government and local affairs, the British drained money from India and did whatever it took to benefit herself only. The British took advantage of the fact that the Indians were defenceless against them.


Although the British who settled in India made it seem like they were trying to improve the lives of all Indians by giving them the western civilization and providing education, not all of the people in India had the same privilege. In 181, only the Indian elites were taught how to read, which was only 10 percent of the total population, and the other 0 percent of the people remained as illiterates (History of India, n.d.). The result of imperialism was not as beneficial to the people in India as the British made it seem, in a way, they provided education to Indian elites in an attempt to make them have the same beliefs and values as the British, since those privileged Indians were most likely going to become leaders in the future. By providing education to these people, Britain could make eventually English become the dominant language in India, so that the multi-lingualism of the Indian culture would slowly fade away. The attempt to change culture did not only happen to the Indians, but to most colonies in Africa as well. After the Berlin Conference in 1885, most parts in Africa were claimed by Britain, France, and Germany, the people in the colonies also had to adapt to western's way of life even when they already had their own culture (History of Africa, n.d.). Imperialism caused the people in the colonies to lose their unique way of life. The construction done in Congo by Belgium is also an example that shows a mother country did certain things to benefit herself. Belgium built new railways and roads because they needed new routes to transported the raw materials taken from the colonies, such as gold, ivory, diamonds, etc, as efficiently as possible to increase the production and the number of trades that could be made (Mitchner & Tuffs. 17. P.185). Belgium made it seem like the constructions were done to make the conditions in the Congo better, but actually, they only benefited themselves as the new routes increased the amount of trade made, which helped Belgium's economy. Congo, however, did not benefit from the new form of transportation as she did not get a share of the wealth. It was Belgium who benefited from it.


Invading foreign countries was how imperialism worked, as this was the only way to colonize a place. Britain usually ended up getting the colony that she aimed for, which was a gain for her, but the process of seizing the colony was usually not pretty. An example would be Britain's invasion in Zululand in 1877 (Mitchner & Tuffs. 17. P.188). The Zulus had no choice but to fight the modern army of Britain when they invaded, and as a result of that, most of them were killed and their own nation was divided into occupied districts. This did not only happen to the Zulus, but to the Boers who died in the Boer War too. In the Boer War, the British troops were supported by the troops from Australia, Canada and other parts of the British Empire, thus they overpowered the Boers. Because of this war, over 7000 men and 8,000 innocent women and children died (Mitchner & Tuffs. 17. P.18-10). In the history of imperialism, some colonies were stripped of culture, others were stripped of materials and money, but nothing could be worse than being killed by the mother countries that invaded their land.


Buy cheap harm done to colonies due to imperialism term paper


In conclusion, imperialism was not beneficial to its colonies for the most part, although sometimes the mother countries made it appear otherwise. It seemed like new facilities such as new buildings and roads built to improve the living conditions in the colonies, but in reality, the mother countries were only attempting to benefit themselves so they could become wealthier. They also did things without considering what could happen to their colonies, such as taking materials from them and creating larger industries than the ones that the colonies have, which resulted the closures of the colonies' businesses. The culture of the people who originally lived in the colony has been invaded as imperialist nations took control and attempted to spread their western ideas. The result of that was the loss of identity for the people. Not only that, they were always being treated as second-class citizens in their own country due to the cultural differences between the mother country and the colonies. Worse of all, the innocents were killed in the process of claiming a colony.


Please note that this sample paper on harm done to colonies due to imperialism is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on harm done to colonies due to imperialism, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on harm done to colonies due to imperialism will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment from cheap essay writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Beowulf

If you order your cheap essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on beowulf. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality beowulf paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in beowulf, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your beowulf paper at affordable prices with cheap essay writing service! Beowulf, A True Epic Hero


An epic hero is a man of divine ancestry, who is endowed with great courage and strength, has loyalty and generosity, speaks genuinely in prolonged speeches, is celebrated for his bold exploits, and undertakes obstacles to protect his society (Benson ). In the Anglo-Saxon poem Beowulf, Beowulf is depicted as the epic hero as he exemplifies all the qualities of this type of hero. However, some beg to differ, stating that he is the opposite of a hero; rather he is a ‘bully'. But if he is a ‘bully' then why does he fit the definition of a true epic hero? First, he is of noble birth and possesses supernatural strength. Beowulf also is a loyal and generous warrior who keeps both his king and his kingdom at heart. In addition, his tone is serious and his language grand. He also undertakes quests to achieve something of tremendous value to himself and his society. At the end of his quest, his people glorify him. Therefore, these characteristics make Beowulf a true epic hero.


A characteristic that Beowulf possesses that defines him as a true epic hero is that he is born of noble birth. He is the son of Ecgtheow, who married King Hrethel's only daughter. Due to his father's "abandonment and death", his maternal grandfather, King Hrethel, raised him (Benson 6). Beowulf, "being a great warrior", went to Denmark to fight (Benson 7). When he returned from Denmark, Hygelac, and Ecgtheow's brother-in-law welcomed him. With the consent of Hygelac, Beowulf went to fight Grendel. He was adhered to be sent from divine order to fight against evil and save his kingdom from subjugation when the Danes stated, "…Our Holy Father has sent him as a sign of his grace, a mark of his favor, to help us defeat Grendel and end that terror"(Beowulf 81-84). Consequently, he was seen to be of noble birth through the eyes of his people.


Another trait that defines Beowulf as a true epic hero is his supernatural strength. Indeed, "His bravery and power surpassed all mortal men" (Huppe 4). The poet described Beowulf as "…greater/And stronger than anyone anywhere in this world" (Beowulf 15-16). Because of this trait he is seen as a hero in the eyes of his fellow men. He is able to use his super-human physical strength and courage to put his people before himself. One of his fellow warriors said "out of all the men on earth, one greater/ Than has come with you" (Beowulf 47-4). Beowulf fought in numerous battles and returned victorious from all but his last. When he went to fight he was very confident and implied "…the monsters scorn of men/ is so great that he needs no weapons and fears none/ Now will I…" (Beowulf 4-44). He swum for seven nights and stopped to kill nine sea creatures in the depths of the ocean. Also, with his bare hands he ripped off the arm of Grendel, a monster that has been terrorizing the Danes for twelve years. The reason why Beowulf decided to kill Grendel without any armor is because he felt that he should have "no advantage" over Grendel, thus proving to his people that his supernatural strength in turn makes him courageous and skillful (Huppe ). This is shown when he assured the Danish Queen of defeat against Grendel


Cheap University Papers on beowulf


When we crossed the sea, my comrades


And I, I already knew that all


My purpose was this to win the good will


Of your people or die in battle, pressed


In Grendel's fierce grip. Let me live in greatness


And courage, or here in this hall welcome,


My death! (Beowulf 61-67)


His supernatural strength is also exposed when he fought Grendel's mother. He was able to slay her by slashing her neck with a giant's sword that can only be lifted by a person as strong as Beowulf.


Another quality that Beowulf possesses that defines him as a true epic hero is that he is loyal and generous to the king and his kingdom. He respected the king, he was "ever loyal" to Hyglec, his kinsmen, and to Hygd the Queen of Geats (Brodeur 17). Because of his courageous abilities and loyalty to the king he was offered many gifts such as treasures and jewelry, but he usually turned them down or gave the assets to others in the kingdom. Even when he was offered the thrown by Hygd, he still turned it down. A further example of his loyalty to the king is shown when he was given treasures by Hygd to deliver to Hygelac. Beowulf could have easily taken some of the treasures since there was an over abundance of jewels, but being an honest hero, he delivered it in full to Hygelac. Not only did Beowulf show loyalty to the king, someone of high power, but he also showed a great deal to the common people. He never cared about wealth; rather he was all about honor and giving (Brodeur 18). In fact, Beowulf's only request when he died was to have a light tower built in his name to help guide sailors in the darkness. Beowulf had set a prime example for all human beings relaying the necessity of brotherhood and friendship.


Another characteristic that exemplifies Beowulf as a true epic hero is his serious tone and grand language. He does not talk for any reason rather he has "great determination and intimidation" in his lengthy wordy speeches (Goldsmith 17). One prime example where this is shown is when he was addressing his fellow soldiers "We are Geats/ Men who follow Higlac. My father/ was a famous soldier…Forever, for as long as Herot towers/ High on your hills." (Beowulf 60-85). In this speech he was indirectly telling the soldiers to be determined in their battle and to intimidate their enemies. Another example is shown when Unferth taunted Beowulf. He claimed that once Beowulf lost a swimming match against Breca and that Beowulf will meet with defeat for a second time when he faces Grendel in the mead-hall. Beowulf responded by saying, "Ah! Unferth, my friend, your face/ Is hot with Ale, and your tongue has tried/…May enter this hall that evil will be gone!" (Beowulf 50-607). Basically in his responsive speech, Beowulf intimidated Unferth by proving that he lost victoriously because he had swum for seven days and killed nine monsters along his way. Beowulf's did not only have physical strength he also had verbal skills that he used to illustrate his heroism.


A fourth characteristic that defines Beowulf as an epic hero is he undertakes quests to achieve something of tremendous value to himself and his society. With great motives of gaining the people's respect and restoring peace to the community, Beowulf requested to journey to Herot at a time of crisis to fend off it's evil (Hume 1). He showed no sign of fear when he went into battles. He never looked back and always accomplished what he set out to do. He always explained his death wishes before going into battle and "requested to have any assets delivered to his people" (Hume 14). After some of his battles, Beowulf was crowned King of Danes. During his reign as King a fire dragon began to destroy the town that he built. In his last battle, Beowulf sought out to rid the town once again of its villain. He took the life of another monster, but this time he also died. In his last words he spoke of how he will die happy because his kingdom was now safe from harm, "I'd leave my armor to my son/…so long, if I look at this last of all prizes." (Beowulf 7-751).


A final characteristic of Beowulf that makes him a true epic hero is that his people glorify him. After slaying Grendel and Grendel's mother, he was regarded as a hero by many Thanes. He was also awarded gold and a festive feast was held for him by Heorot. Also he was given land to govern. His death was honorable as Wiglaf implied, "How often an entire country suffers/ on one man's account! That time has come to use…" (Beowulf 077-078). At his funeral Wiglaf along with seven warriors gather treasure and carried the king along with it to the Cape of Whale. A pyre was built with helmets and shields surrounding it, and it was lit. The warriors sang a dirge and an old woman wailed in sorrow, proclaiming that "the bloodshed, shame and bondage is soon going to beset the Geats" (Harris 7). For ten days, the Geats work on the barrow, burying the ash from the funeral as well as the treasure in it, till a high mound was built. Then twelve brave warriors rode around it, bemoaning the death of the king, and of their sorrow, and singing a dirge highlighting his valor, and praising him for being the kindest and gentlest of kings, and foe being "most mindful" of his glory (Harris 8).


Even though many already agree and see Beowulf is a true epic hero. There are those who see Beowulf as a ‘bully' rather then an epic hero. Two prime examples in which Beowulf is depicted as a ‘bully' are presented in John Gardner's Grendel and "Beowulf," by Richard Wilbur.


In John Gardner's Grendel, Grendel tells his side of the story. He feels useless in society and does not want to accept his given role. He states the he never set out to hurt man just understand him. He mentions that when he shows up for the first time in the mead hall he yells Mercy! Peace! (Grendel 7). No one even gives him a chance when he walks in holding a dead body and using it for protection against the drunken men swinging axes and swords at him, referring to Beowulf and his men (Grendel 8). Throughout the book, Grendel pretends to be innocent, which he is clearly not. If he was as innocent as he depicts himself to be then why would he return to a place where he does not feel accepted? The answer is because he likes to cause trouble. He tries to use the excuse that he was rejected by Beowulf and his men to justify his actions of going into the mead hall and causing distress to the common people.


Another example that depicts Beowulf as a ‘bully' rather then a hero is presented in the poem "Beowulf" by Richard Wilbur. Here Wilbur compares Grendel to a child


It was a childish country; and a child,


Grown monstrous, so besieged them in the night


That all their daytimes were a dream of fright


That it would come and own them to the bones


The hero, to his battle reconciled,


Promised to meet that monster all alone. (Wilbur 15)


After reading such a verse one automatically thinks that Beowulf is a ‘bully', since he wants to confront Grendel one on one. However, Wilbur fails to show what Grendel has done in Geatland. He does not mention that Grendel disturbed Geatland and was a threat to the kingdom. Why would someone be considered a ‘bully' if they were providing protection to their kingdom? Beowulf did what a hero would do for his kingdom and that is to protect it from any harm.


As one can clearly see, Beowulf is a true epic hero. He is of noble birth and possesses great supernatural strength. Also he speaks in a serious tone and incorporates lengthy speeches. In addition he put his people's welfare before his by undertaking quests to achieve something of significant value. At the end of his battles, his people glorify him. All of Beowulf's heroic deeds and battles make him the superhero he desires to be. Perhaps what makes Beowulf live today, forever a legend of our past, is the fact that he did die, making him a mortal being; living and dying with the people, for the people, and as a person.


Please note that this sample paper on beowulf is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on beowulf, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom research papers on beowulf will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment from cheap essay writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!